Terrorists are criminals. They are not soldiers, or enemy combatants, or any other term we’d like to use that might somehow remove the rights they deserve. They are criminals. Criminals are dealt with through our justice system, treated fairly and humanely, and then put in prison if they are convicted in a court that respects our rule of law. The prison must also be in a place where that rule of law is respected. Treating a criminal like this is what makes America America. And if acting this way as a nation somehow makes America more of a target, bring it on. It is not an act of weakness but of strength, and better we be targeted for that than for black sites, torture, or for hateful rhetoric.
If a politician or pundit wants to suggest otherwise, then they are, literally, un-American.
(And no terrorist should ever face the death penalty. The unique mindset of terrorists that celebrates death as it does should forbid us from anything they might feel is a reward.)
Also, we are fighting 2 wars right now, asking men and women to die for the freedom we hardly ever remember to enjoy. There is often a bunch of explanation that usually diffuses that but at it’s core that’s exactly what our armed services protect. And this past week between the murders at Fort Hood and the always overdue retrospection around Veterans/Armistice Day it was hard not to think about this price we pay for freedom.
One hears this word far too much these days here in the US. It’s Bravehearted by the questionably informed (and questionably sane) at “tea” parties, on vaudeville political talk shows, and with staged passion on the floors of congress. But it’s important, this word, this idea, this ideal. It supersedes nationalism or other bullshit expressions of patriotism, it supersedes the theater of the marginalized or fearful, and it especially supersedes the idea that we can pick and choose who is or is not entitled to our rule of law – a system which defines what freedom actually means outside of a dictionary or rhetorical flourish.
How can we choose to narrow the very thing our service members are still dying for, every single day…
Echoes of the kind of operation Al Qaeda was able to put together prior to the attacks of 9/11: a Taliban leader named Baitullah Mehsud has amassed a significant level of power and is proceeding with the destabilization of Pakistan, a domino everyone agrees must not be allowed to fall in the conflict against Islamic Jihad. He currently has a $5 million bounty on his head, and an army at his beck and call:
12,000 local fighters, many belonging to his own Mehsud tribe, and close to 4,000 foreign fighters, predominantly Arabs and Central Asians seasoned in the Afghan jihad of the 1980s. Many of them spent time in al Qaeda training camps and can’t return to their home countries for fear of prosecution… He also has a stable of teenage boys who have been indoctrinated to serve as suicide bombers.
And he has built a security zone around himself in the areas he occupies, often with ambitious assassinations:
the government has met little success because Mehsud has in many cases dismantled the centuries-old tribal structures in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA); there is no mechanism left to mobilize against him. This June, another Taliban commander, Qari Zainuddin, challenged Mehsud and was assassinated by one of his own bodyguards. The murder was a stark message to others who might try the same.
The US has been targeting him with drone attacks, but it might only be through cutting off his funding that he can he stopped or slowed – that is of course if anyone could find out where he gets his money – they can’t. He does have a potential weakness in that for someone who never allows his face to be photographed he has a flare for publicity and even invited many journalists to an Osama Bin Laden-like “Kill the Americans” declaration, something which theoretically could have exposed him to capture. However go read
From this article Mehsud frighteningly seems even more dangerous (if less funded) than Bin Laden was in the several years prior to 9/11. It is a must read for those thinking about the dynamics at play in the Middle East. It is also worth relating to the Iran story in realizing that the one enemy American and Iran share is the Taliban. In fact Iran (under then President Khatami, but with Khamenei’s blessing of course) connected the US military with the Northern Alliance in the early days of the war in Afghanistan, providing crucial on-the-ground intelligence on where to bomb the Taliban. And make no mistake, if Ahmadinejad had actionable intelligence on someone like Mehsud – no matter what the status of Iran’s democracy or crackdown, the US would have open ears. That is the nature of the beast.
by Imtiaz Ali @ Foreign Policy